hong coin admin flaw
so the number that matters is the $2m, because that’s what a decade-old admin mistake can still leak if nobody reads the contract like an attacker first. a white hat didn’t ‘save’ it so much as demonstrate the exact path the system had already left open, then turn that into a refund. that’s the whole game: process beats branding, and the flaw was in the function, not the story.
https://cointelegraph.com/news/whitehat-helps-recover-2m-from-2016-ico-smart-contract?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound